About
A weekly publication about training, nutrition and recovery. One article a week, written to be read in order rather than grazed.
What “balanced” means here
Most fitness writing arrives in one of two modes: aggressive, or vague. This is neither. Claims are stated flatly when the evidence supports them and hedged when it does not, and the aim is that you finish each piece able to do something differently on Monday.
Nothing here is trying to be exhaustive. A short article you act on beats a long one you admire — most pieces take 2 minutes or less.
Who writes it
Debesh Kuanr. Articles carry a byline, a publication date and, where the subject moves, a review date. Where a claim rests on research rather than consensus, the article says which.
How the reading path works
If you answer the nine questions, the site orders the library for your experience, goal, schedule and equipment — as a sequence, not a filtered list, because a list of forty articles is no more useful than the library itself.
Your answers are stored in your own browser. There is no account, no tracking of who read what, and nothing is sent to a server. Clearing your browser data clears your path, and the path page can clear it deliberately.
Its relationship to Repko
Repko is a training app built around the same principles this site explains: start a plan, log the work, evaluate it, adjust. The writing here is the reasoning; the app is where you act on it.
That relationship is disclosed rather than hidden — it is in the masthead on every page. Articles say so when they are relevant to a particular part of the app, in a marked aside rather than in the prose, and every one of them is written to be useful whether or not you ever install anything.
Corrections
If something here is wrong or has been superseded, it gets corrected rather than quietly deleted, and the article's review date changes. Nothing published is removed: if a link to this site ever 404s, the piece has moved, not vanished.